In this post I am going to look at Rose Knevett or Knyvett, the mother of Tristram Beresford, my 11xgreat grandfather who was agent for The Honourable The Irish Society in the Plantation of Ulster in the early 17th Century.
We are in no doubt that Tristram’s parents were named Michael and Rose. The 1619 Visitation of Kent explicitly shows that Tristram of Londonderry was the 3rd son of Michael Beresford of Squerryes in Westerham, Kent and his wife Rose, daughter of John Kneute de … . There are several errors and omissions in the various Beresford pedigrees which I’ll come to later, but this seems clear enough. The same family also appears in the 1574 Visitation living at Otford (near Sevenoaks) with Rose’s maiden name being spelt Kneuitt. (The letter v is consistently transcribed as u.)
Many online trees have decided that this John Knevitt must be the son who died in the lifetime of his mother Jane Bourchier Knyvett, 3rd Baroness Berners de jure, of Ashwellthorpe in Norfolk. It’s a tempting proposition – that John has many fascinating ancestors. (Jane Bourchier descended from Edward III and was cousin to two wives of Henry VIII by her grandmother’s second marriage. I wrote about them all in my post on West Horsley Place.) The dates fit – that John was born about 1518 and Rose about 1540. And that John had a sister called Rose (wife of Oliver Reymes) named in his mother’s will.
But unfortunately there is a fly in the ointment. There were Knevetts in Kent at this period. The Blackwood pedigrees of the Beresfords in Ireland state that John Knevitt was ‘of County Kent’. I found a reference to two Knevett brothers of West Kent taking part in the Battle of Hartley 1554. (The Beresfords owned 30 acres of land at Hartley.) One online source even gives a marriage date of 3 May 1564 at Sevenoaks for Michael Beresford and Rose Knevitt. It claims it’s taken from familysearch.org but I have been unable to find that record.
![Ashwellthorpe Font.jpeg](https://chriswestancestryblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ca8a4b37-dbad-46fd-9eaf-f5ae9e10ab26-e1593379152603.jpeg?w=150&h=138)
The final proof that Rose was not from Norfolk comes in the footnotes of the 1619 Visitation. It gives her family’s arms as Gules, three plates charged with a cinquefoil sable. This clearly has no similarity at all with the Knyvett arms that are found throughout the church in Ashwellthorpe.
You can see Rose’s arms in the tomb of her daughter Bennet in the church of St Nicholas at Ash near Canterbury. Bennet married Sir Thomas Harflete or Septvans and on their tomb they each have escutcheons above them representing their parents’ marriages. Bennet has the Beresford arms impaling Gules, six plates argent charged with a cinquefoil (or a fleur-de-lys?) sable.
The same arms can be seen on the tomb of their daughter in nearby Wingham church. (Picture to follow.)
So it would seem that anybody interested in the ancestry of Rose Knevett would have to do some work on the Kent line of Knevetts.
Errors in the Beresford pedigrees
I mentioned earlier that there are problems with the Beresford pedigrees.
- The 1619 pedigree wrongly attributes the children of George Beresford, Michael’s eldest son, to Richard, the second son. George’s 1613 will mentions all these children. (Notice how rich he was! He gave £400 to each of his daughters and that’s at least £75000 in today’s money.) Even in the unlikely event that George and Richard had nine children with identical names, we know it was George’s son Michael who inherited Squerryes because his mother Elizabeth Petley is named in his IPM of 1628.
- It also omits Michael’s second and third wives. His third wife, Dorothy, is mentioned in his will and they had a son William and two daughters, Mary and Jane. (Notice how stingy he was! £500 to Mary & Jane, but only £4 to the poor of Westerham.) Dorothy was born Dorothy Cromer or Crowmer and had several children by her first marriage to William Seyliard. One of them, Elizabeth Seyliard, married her stepbrother Cornelius Beresford and they were ancestors of the Presidents Bush of the USA.
The Beresford arms seem to change between the two Visitations. There are two sets of arms associated with Beresford – the one with the 3 fleur-de-lys and the one with the bear. I think what happened is that Michael descended from a younger son who adopted his own arms, but the senior branch died out, so the cadet branch was able to use both.
- Thomas, the 4th son of Michael and Rose, is omitted from the earlier Visitation. This could be explained by Thomas being the 4th surviving son, born after 1574. But I think this is the same family in the 1569 Visitation of Nottinghamshire (Michael’s father was Steward of Nottingham):
In this pedigree Nicholas has the same parents as Michael of Westerham and seven children whose names match those of Michael’s eldest seven children (although George is 14 years too old). Surely Nich is a misprint for Mich? And Rose is now the daughter of John Fitzwilliam of Knevett, a place which does not exist. Does this mean John’s father was William Knevett? Perhaps the one that fought at Hartley in 1554?
Even if Nicholas is a brother of Michael, this pedigree introduces more inconsistencies. George Beresford, the Steward of Nottingham, has the same wife as in the Visitations of Kent but different parents. Personally I believe that Michael, who signed the 1574 Visitation, knew the name of his own grandfather. I think that the John marked as a brother to the Steward of Nottingham was actually his father. Wouldn’t it be great if the original scrolls were made available digitally rather than these inaccurate 19th Century transcriptions?
We need the extra generation between Michael and Thomas in the above tree. Thomas Beresford of Derbyshire died in 1473, 135 years before Michael which sounds too distant to be a great-grandfather. The Blackwood pedigrees, which follow the Visitation of Nottingham, give a date of 1505 for the marriage of John Beresford and Miss Fitzherbert. This sounds right for Michael’s grandfather, not his uncle.
The tomb of Thomas Beresford and his wife Agnes Hassall in Fenny Bentley church is a strange monument. They lie in eerie stone shrouds, like ossified courgettes. Their 21 children, depicted in the same way, perform a macabre dance round the sides.